[rosa-devel] Updates Builder
symbianflo at mandrivausers.ro
Thu Dec 26 15:15:06 MSK 2013
Just a thought..
I think that first of all we need a clean and right spec file , because to
update on those specs , by only increase
the version it is a mess...I know that years ago those spec files ware
perfect , but now ...
Or maybe its just me who hates useless macros and bullets....
IMHO graphite2 ( for example) should be rebuild with graphite2, lib%name
and %devname, separate
provided packages, maybe a bit of %major definition (just to keep a future
I mean at least those witch end up in main or main-updates....
2013/12/26 Symbian Flo <symbianflo at mandrivausers.ro>
> python-twitter ,test failed just because missing deps, ( as i see..) so
> now should pass since I've imported requests-oathlib and oathlib
> ( would be very useful if we can add annotations in some way, and relaunch
> the builder...)
> 2013/12/25 Denis Silakov <denis.silakov at rosalab.ru>
>> On 12/25/2013 12:07 AM, Denis Silakov wrote:
>> build fixed,
>> merged pull request from auto-update to 2012.1
>> until here I've got it...:D
>> now what's next?
>> Let's see - this night Updates Builder should automatically detect that
>> you have fixed the package and update the table correspondingly.
>> Yeah, done now:)
>> Meanwhile, there are a lot of builds failed 2013-12-25 - don't take them
>> into account, they failed due to a typo I made in launcher scripts... They
>> will all be rerun today evening.
>> Denis Silakov, ROSA Laboratory.www.rosalab.ru
>> rosa-devel mailing list
>> rosa-devel at lists.rosalab.ru
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rosa-devel